Showing posts with label human trafficking. Show all posts
Showing posts with label human trafficking. Show all posts

Monday, April 2, 2007

Israel Hires Maxim For National PR Campaign: Come See Our Tits!

Israel is number one in sex slavery. Coinkydink?
---
Click on image to enlarge

Girls: Israel’s racy new PR strategy

Israel flirts with a racy new public-relations strategy.

By Kevin Peraino
Newsweek

April 9, 2007 issue - Jim Malucci has two tattoos, one on each bulging bicep. On the left one, the photographer for Maxim magazine has etched an image of a seductively dressed pinup; on the right, he has stenciled the words GO WITH GOD in Portuguese. He leans on his left arm and points his camera at a model in a bikini on the Tel Aviv beachfront. "That's hot, that's wicked," says Malucci, as the model shifts her hips and parts her lips. "I wanna see the curves. That's it, honey. On your knees, legs apart. Nice arch in your back—boom!" The flash flickers as the sun drops toward the Mediterranean. A Hassidic man in a black hat accidentally steps into the frame. "Love the guy with the hat!" Malucci says, chortling.

Taking in the scene, David Saranga can't help but grin. The Israeli consular official based in New York approached Maxim six months ago. His proposal: the government and other pro-Israeli groups would fly a camera crew across the Atlantic in an effort to remake the Jewish state's public image. Israel's reputation had suffered after last summer's war with Lebanon; in a recent BBC poll taken in 27 countries, 56 percent of respondents considered Israel a "negative influence" in the world, higher than both Iran and the United States. But Israel's real PR problem, according to Saranga, is that Americans—particularly men aged 18 to 35—either associate the country with war or holy relics, or don't think of it at all. "We have to find the right hook," he says. "And what's relevant to men under 35? Good-looking women."

Saranga's effort is the latest volley in a long-running battle over how to sell Israel to the world. Tourism is a nearly $2 billion-a-year industry in Israel, and the art of public relations is something of a national obsession. In Hebrew it's called hasbarah, which means "explaining." For a country that's always craved international acceptance, hasbarah was "the first growth industry of Israel," the American author Richard Ben Cramer wrote. "We almost have a psychological disorder when it comes to public image," adds Eytan Schwartz, the first winner of Israel's top-rated reality TV show, "The Ambassador." Schwartz's prize is proof of that: the winner of "The Ambassador" gets to become a public-relations flack.

Still, by definition, hasbarah is open to interpretation. One of the central dilemmas is which aspects of Israel's wildly diverse society to emphasize. Israelis disagree about which is more likely to appeal to Americans—Tel Aviv's freewheeling, secular charms, or Jerusalem's holy sites. Settler leader Benny Elon, a former tourism minister, says he considers ads touting Israel's beaches a waste of money. For Elon, it isn't only a cultural issue; it's also bad business. Tourists in search of sunshine will always favor the French Riviera or the Caribbean. Israel's "unique selling proposition" is its religious heritage, says Elon. "It's the only state where you can take the Bible as your tourism guide." A recent study by the consulting firm Ernst & Young recommends that the Jewish state target American evangelical Christian tourists—one of Elon's pet projects.

Yet trying too hard to lure Christian tourists could end up alienating secular liberals. "Benny Elon is just dead wrong," says Harvard Law School professor Alan Dershowitz, author of "The Case for Israel." "It puts Israel in the camp of arch-conservative people." Already, a recent study by the New York marketing firm Wunderman has concluded that Israel's "brand" is perceived similarly to those of Philip Morris and the NRA. Ultimately evangelicals' support for Israeli tourism will evaporate, says Dershowitz; Christians will eventually become "disappointed" with the Jewish state as their interests diverge. But even Dershowitz thinks the idea of paying to fly a magazine crew across the Atlantic is a little over the top: "Completely not the way to go. I can see models anywhere."

Saranga insists his campaign is just smart niche marketing. "You have to match the message to the audience," the diplomat says. And his supporters argue that the Jewish state's diversity is one of its strongest selling points. Ultimately, says Dershowitz, "Israel is both countries ... a country where models pose at great holy sites." The tattoos on shooter Jim Malucci's biceps make the balance look easy to find. But marketing budgets are finite, and cultural rifts aren't so easily bridged. The reality of Israel is often having to choose: go with the girl, or go with God.

Wednesday, March 14, 2007

Guatemalan 'baby factory' deals in misery and hope

£700 for a child? Guatemalan 'baby factory' deals in misery and hope

US under pressure to curb trade as 1% of state's babies go abroad

Jo Tuckman in Guatemala City
Wednesday March 14, 2007
The Guardian


Caretaker Virginia de Mendez holds Jose Alberto, a 15-month-old baby in process of adoption, at her home in Guatemala City
Caretaker Virginia de Mendez holds Jose Alberto, a 15-month-old baby in process of adoption, at her home in Guatemala City. Last year 4,943 children were adopted by foreigners with fees of between $20,000 and $30,000 for each adoption. Photograph: Alexandre Meneghini/AP


With its obsequious doormen and bland interior, the Guatemala City Marriott could be just another business hotel anywhere in the world. If it weren't for all the babies.

"Ooooh, you beautiful little girl," one prospective mother from Virginia coos as she lifts a nine-month-old above her head. The pianist in the lobby is playing Beatles ballads, the new father of another infant orders a club sandwich at the next table, and a third baby is pushed past in a buggy. "You're not mine yet, but you will be soon."



Last year 4,943 Guatemalan children - more than 1% of the country's newborns - were adoptyourd by foreigners, the vast majority of them Americans. Guatemala was the second-most important country of origin after China for children adopted abroad by US citizens.

"There is a lot of money to be made and Guatemala has become a baby factory," says Byron Alvarado of the Guatemalan group Movement for Children. With fees of between $20,000-$30,000 (£10,000-£15,000) for every adoption, between $100m and $140m changed hands last year.

"The adopting parents either don't know, or don't want to know, where the children they are adopting come from," he adds.

Teenager Glendy's story is one of thousands that expose the seedier side of the business. Eighteen years old, dumped by her married boyfriend and with below-average intelligence, Glendy described how she was contacted while she was pregnant by some people who promised her 10,000 Quetzales (about £700) for her baby. Desperately poor, she accepted the offer.

Taken away

Her baby was delivered by a midwife in the provincial city of Retalhuleu. Mother and son spent one night together and then he was taken away.

They were briefly reunited a few days later when they boarded a bus bound for the capital with a female minder. The infant was handed over to another woman at a petrol station en route. "I didn't cry when I said goodbye," Glendy remembered. "I waited until I got back on the bus."

After a night in Guatemala City yet another intermediary took her to the shelter where she had lived as a teenager. The man told her to pretend they were getting married in order to retrieve documents needed for the adoption. But, having second thoughts about giving her baby away, Glendy spilled the beans. The minder slipped out of the building and disappeared taking with him the secret of where Glendy's baby was hidden.

Little has been done to stem the flow of Guatemalan adoptions, with the numbers quadrupling between 1997 and last year. Few other countries offer children so young or so quickly to prospective parents. Last year 90% of the country's adopted children were under a year old when they left the country.

But the issue is coming to a head this year as the US prepares to ratify the Hague Convention on Inter-Country Adoption and is consequently coming under international pressure to stop issuing visas to Guatemalan-born children, unless Guatemala implements a proper process of adoption.

In most countries adoption is managed by judges, bureaucrats and social workers. In Guatemala private lawyers run the show. They control the available infants offered to US-based adoption agencies, and they also submit the proposed adoptions for approval by the Guatemalan state institutions.

"All the state does in most cases is check that the right documents are in the file," admits Josefina Arellano, who heads the department that signs off on adoptions. "We rarely investigate the content of the documents, or how they were obtained." Many receiving countries, including the US and the UK, now require DNA testing of the mother and the baby to discourage baby snatching.

Rumours of child stealers roaming the country were common about 10 years ago, along with stories of substitute mothers signing the consent forms.

But activists say DNA tests cannot detect more sophisticated strategies such as sending envoys out to recruit vulnerable women such as Glendy with offers of help and cash, and keeping them in line with threats if they change their mind. Nor can the tests identify women who are repeatedly getting pregnant with the intention of giving away their kids for money. Mr Alvarado favours a moratorium but fears the US government may bend to pressure from the domestic adoption lobby fearful that deserving families could be left without a child. Guateadopt.com insists adoption can give Guatemalan children futures they could never otherwise dream of. "The children of Guatemala need you now," it says on its website.

DNA tests

Stevan Whitehead, who has two Guatemalan-born children and runs an inter-country adoption support group in Britain agrees. "Let's face it, the life of Guatemalan women is quite hard enough without all of that [ruthless operators] to push them to adoption," he says. Inter-country adoption is a rarity in Britain. Only 24 children were adopted from Guatemala last year, putting the country in equal second place with Russia.

The UK side of the procedures is rigorous, with the consul interviewing all birth mothers, in addition to DNA tests being carried out. Mr Whitehead says the British parents of Guatemalan-born children that he knows have tried to establish contact with their children's birth mothers.

Seven US adoptive parents last week felt differently. They had little desire for contact, they said, and no reason to question the vague accounts they had been given of young poverty-stricken women unable to cope: women just like Glendy who had so easily slipped into a deal she now regrets.

Monday, December 18, 2006

The Good Daughter, in a Brothel: NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF & Mary Cheney’s Bundle of Joy: FRANK RICH

THE COMPLETE ARTICLES
The New York Times
OP-ED COLUMNIST

The Good Daughter, in a Brothel
By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF

Published: December 17, 2006

In poor countries where sex trafficking and globalization have fostered new forms of slavery, stories like Yan Kosal’s are still wrenchingly common.

BATTAMBANG, Cambodia

One of the oldest social dichotomies is the one dividing good girls from bad, the madonna from the whore. But in poor countries where sex trafficking and globalization have fostered new forms of slavery, it is the saintly ones — those who risk leaving their villages to help their families — who often end up as whores.

Yan Kosal is a 26-year-old woman here in northwestern Cambodia who was devoted to her aging parents and desperately concerned with providing for them. Her mother is blind, her father is frail, and they depend on her — the only surviving child — for food.

Kosal earned only $30 a month as a peddler, barely enough to scrape by. So when a woman acquaintance told her that she could earn $90 a month selling snacks in Thailand, Kosal leapt at the opportunity.

"I thought I should do this to feed my parents," Kosal said, particularly because her acquaintance offered to escort her to Bangkok. Kosal borrowed $15 to pay her travel expenses, and they set out in September. But once they were in Thailand, where Kosal couldn't speak the language, the trafficker sold her to a brothel.

"First, I cried," Kosal said. But the brothel manager beat Kosal until she capitulated. "If the men wanted to go to the room," Kosal said numbly, "the girl had to go." The women were paid nothing, except for tips — but the sad ones who wept and were uncooperative didn't get tips.

--MORE--

---


OP-ED COLUMNIST
Mary Cheney’s Bundle of Joy
By FRANK RICH

Published: December 17, 2006

Gay-baiting may do candidates who traffic in it more harm than good.

IT'S not the least of John McCain's political talents that he comes across as a paragon of straight talk even when he isn't talking straight. So it was a surprise to see him reduced to near-stammering on ABC's "This Week" two Sundays after the election. The subject that brought him low was the elephant in the elephants' room, or perhaps we should say in their closet: homosexuality.

Senator McCain is no bigot, and his only goal was to change the subject as quickly as possible. He kept repeating two safe talking points for dear life: he opposes same-sex marriage (as does every major presidential aspirant in both parties) and he is opposed to discrimination. But because he had endorsed a broadly written Arizona ballot initiative that could have been used to discriminate against unmarried domestic partners, George Stephanopoulos wouldn't let him off the hook.

"Are you against civil unions for gay couples?" he asked the senator, who replied, "No, I'm not." When Mr. Stephanopoulos reiterated the question seconds later — "So you're for civil unions?" — Mr. McCain answered, "No." In other words, he was not against civil unions before he was against them. His gaffe was reminiscent of a similar appearance on Mr. Stephanopoulos's show in 2004 by Bill Frist, a Harvard-trained doctor who refused to criticize a federal abstinence program that catered to the religious right by spreading the canard that sweat and tears could transmit AIDS.

--MORE--

Reposted

Sunday, December 17, 2006

The Good Daughter, in a Brothel: NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF & Mary Cheney’s Bundle of Joy: FRANK RICH

THE COMPLETE ARTICLES
The New York Times
OP-ED COLUMNIST

The Good Daughter, in a Brothel
By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF

Published: December 17, 2006

In poor countries where sex trafficking and globalization have fostered new forms of slavery, stories like Yan Kosal’s are still wrenchingly common.

BATTAMBANG, Cambodia

One of the oldest social dichotomies is the one dividing good girls from bad, the madonna from the whore. But in poor countries where sex trafficking and globalization have fostered new forms of slavery, it is the saintly ones — those who risk leaving their villages to help their families — who often end up as whores.

Yan Kosal is a 26-year-old woman here in northwestern Cambodia who was devoted to her aging parents and desperately concerned with providing for them. Her mother is blind, her father is frail, and they depend on her — the only surviving child — for food.

Kosal earned only $30 a month as a peddler, barely enough to scrape by. So when a woman acquaintance told her that she could earn $90 a month selling snacks in Thailand, Kosal leapt at the opportunity.

"I thought I should do this to feed my parents," Kosal said, particularly because her acquaintance offered to escort her to Bangkok. Kosal borrowed $15 to pay her travel expenses, and they set out in September. But once they were in Thailand, where Kosal couldn't speak the language, the trafficker sold her to a brothel.

"First, I cried," Kosal said. But the brothel manager beat Kosal until she capitulated. "If the men wanted to go to the room," Kosal said numbly, "the girl had to go." The women were paid nothing, except for tips — but the sad ones who wept and were uncooperative didn't get tips.

--MORE--

---


OP-ED COLUMNIST
Mary Cheney’s Bundle of Joy
By FRANK RICH

Published: December 17, 2006

Gay-baiting may do candidates who traffic in it more harm than good.

IT'S not the least of John McCain's political talents that he comes across as a paragon of straight talk even when he isn't talking straight. So it was a surprise to see him reduced to near-stammering on ABC's "This Week" two Sundays after the election. The subject that brought him low was the elephant in the elephants' room, or perhaps we should say in their closet: homosexuality.

Senator McCain is no bigot, and his only goal was to change the subject as quickly as possible. He kept repeating two safe talking points for dear life: he opposes same-sex marriage (as does every major presidential aspirant in both parties) and he is opposed to discrimination. But because he had endorsed a broadly written Arizona ballot initiative that could have been used to discriminate against unmarried domestic partners, George Stephanopoulos wouldn't let him off the hook.

"Are you against civil unions for gay couples?" he asked the senator, who replied, "No, I'm not." When Mr. Stephanopoulos reiterated the question seconds later — "So you're for civil unions?" — Mr. McCain answered, "No." In other words, he was not against civil unions before he was against them. His gaffe was reminiscent of a similar appearance on Mr. Stephanopoulos's show in 2004 by Bill Frist, a Harvard-trained doctor who refused to criticize a federal abstinence program that catered to the religious right by spreading the canard that sweat and tears could transmit AIDS.

--MORE--

Monday, November 20, 2006

Bought and Sold: BOB HERBERT

THE COMPLETE ARTICLE

The New York Times

OP-ED COLUMNIST
Bought and Sold
By BOB HERBERT

Published: November 20, 2006


One of the most tightly kept secrets in the U.S. is the extent to which children are sexually exploited by men who are viewed as quintessentially solid citizens.


MORE : Bought and Sold

The number one global crime business is drugs. In second place is arms trafficking. I was shocked to find human trafficking is tied for second place.