Sunday, November 19, 2006

US Attorney General: The Constitution Imperils America


Gonzales Blasts Surveillance Critics
Attorney General Gonzales Takes Up Attack on Ruling Against Warrantless Surveillance
By CHASE SQUIRES

The Associated Press

AIR FORCE ACADEMY, Colo. - Attorney General Alberto Gonzales contended Saturday that some critics of the Bush administration's warrantless surveillance program were defining freedom in a way that poses a "grave threat" to U.S. security.

Gonzales was the second administration official in two days to attack a federal judge's ruling last August that the program was unconstitutional. Vice President Dick Cheney on Friday called the ruling "an indefensible act of judicial overreaching."

Gonzales told about 400 cadets from the Air Force Academy's political science and law classes that some see the program as on the verge of stifling freedom rather that protecting the country.

"But this view is shortsighted," he said. "Its definition of freedom one utterly divorced from civic responsibility is superficial and is itself a grave threat to the liberty and security of the American people."

Gonzales and Cheney's attacks on the court order came as the administration was urging the lame-duck Congress to approve legislation authorizing the warrantless surveillance. The bill's chances are in doubt, however, because of Democratic opposition in the Senate, where 60 votes are required to end debate and vote.

At a news conference, Gonzales would not speculate how the administration would react if Congress did not authorize warrantless surveillance.

"We're optimistic because of the importance of this program, the success of the program, the stated commitment of the Democratic leadership to work with us in protection of America, and that we're going to have a good discussion and dialogue about the program," he said.

"We believe the president has the authority under the authorization of military force and inherent authority of the constitution to engage in this sort of program, but we want to supplement that authority," he said.

The administration has maintained that its warrantless surveillance program focuses on international calls involving suspected terrorists, and dismisses charges that it is illegal because it bypasses federal law requiring a judge-issued warrant for such eavesdropping.

"It's absolutely essential that we maintain the tool," he told reporters. "It's been very, very important in protecting America, and we look forward to working with Congress to find a way that we can supplement the president's authority, and continue to maintain this as a valuable tool for the American people."

In August, the program was struck down by U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor in Detroit, who said it violated the rights to free speech and privacy and the constitutional separation of powers. She was the first judge to rule on the legality of the program, which is operated by the National Security Agency.

The government has appealed. Bush and other administration officials argue that the program is legal under the president's constitutional powers and has saved lives by helping to disrupt terrorist plots.

Speaking to the cadets, Gonzales dismissed as "myth" the charge that civil liberties were being sacrificed in the fight against terrorism. He defended the Patriot Act and the handling of detainees at the U.S. military base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

"To achieve victory at the cost of eroding civil liberties would not really be a victory. We cannot change the core identity of our nation and claim success," said Gonzales, an Air Force veteran who attended the Air Force Academy from 1975 to 1977.

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2664435

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

So, Gonzalez and Chertoff are now using French philosophy to justify American actions?

Either Federalists are the most ignorant people on earth, poor students of history, or are looking for ways to repeat it.

Parallels from the rhetoric of Robespierre, to Napoleon, as well as Mussolini can all be made here.

The only threat to Liberty, are those who claim the Constitution, wich has served the United States through several wars is suddenly "quaint" or "inadequate".

The claims of international law, civic responsibility, "judicial overeach", and the need to use illegal methods and violence to stop terror, all come from totaliterian philosophy.

These two aren't the first to regurgitate "absolute power"(dictatorship) as the only way to "protect the __fill in the blank__ way of life". Yup, we've heard this one before.

Robespierre needed to protect the Liberty of the French with his "philosophy of terror", Napoleon's "unitary executive" theory amounted to dictatorship but he claimed it was all for Liberty and the Republic, Mussolini envisioned freedom for the select few "that believed", finally, as if we needed anymore more proof...Hitler wanted to "protect the german way of life" from terrorists, with similar arguments being made by Gonzalez and Chertoff.

How stupid do these guys think Americans are? Sure, if you watch foxnews you'll clap like a walrus to almost anything, but anyone who can use google will be able to find the same arguments Chertoff and Gonzalez are making, from the most despotic tyrants and leaders of violent political factions the earth has ever known.

Gonzalez probably admires these opressors, because he DOES know history, and he aims to repeat it by distorting Freedom and Liberty using clever lawyer language and hoping nobody catches it.

Even American revolutionaries knew this way back then. Unfortunately, the French, Italians, and Germans learned the hard way..just to name a few.

Listen to what Jefferson had to say about using the methods that Robespierre outlined in his "philosophy of terror". You will be disgusted, frightened, and understand the doctrine that these totaliterianist thinkers are suggesting...when you see for yourself, that their arguments are just the same smoke and mirrors employed by other "unitary executive" theorists. We know now, that the only purpose for those pretty words using Liberty and Freedom as foundations, are to subjugate the very people they are trying to convince.

"I hope and firmly believe that the whole world will sooner or later feel benefit from the issue of our assertion of the rights of man. Although the horrors of the French Revolution have damped for awhile the ardor of the patriots in every country, yet it is not extinguished--it will never die. The sense of right has been excited in every breast, and the spark will be rekindled by the very oppressions of that detestable tyranny employed to quench it. The errors of the honest patriots of France and the crimes of her Dantons and Robespierres will be forgotten in the more encouraging contemplation of our sober example and steady march to our object. Hope will strengthen the presumption that what has been done once may be done again." --Thomas Jefferson to Benjamin Galloway, 1812. ME 13:130

MAXIMILIEN ROBESPIERRE
THE POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY OF TERROR

http://tinyurl.com/yem9us

Napoleon’s Own Account of His Coup d’Etat (10 November 1799)

http://chnm.gmu.edu/revolution/d/502/

Mussolini, Doctrine of Fascism (1932)

http://tinyurl.com/yekfou

Marc Parent mparent7777 mparent CCNWON said...

Fantastic commentary, my friend. Good to see you found your way back to the CCNWON.

Best,

Marc

Your links are not hot I see, perhaps another one of the deficts of the blogging host.

I will see if I can correct it.

When un-hotlinks occur in some of my comments on other blogs, I post my link to the blogging software then convert it to html code. I copy that and enter it into my commentm correction and voila!

Marc Parent mparent7777 mparent CCNWON said...

I'm testing html code transfer here:

MAXIMILIEN ROBESPIERRE

THE POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY OF TERROR

http://tinyurl.com/yem9us

Napoleon’s Own Account of His Coup d’Etat (10 November 1799)

http://chnm.gmu.edu/revolution/d/502/

Mussolini, Doctrine of Fascism (1932)

http://tinyurl.com/yekfou