Showing posts with label Gaza. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gaza. Show all posts

Saturday, April 28, 2007

Gaza as Israel's testing ground

Gaza as Israel's testing ground
Doctors in Gaza have been reporting strange wounds on the bodies of innocent bystanders and those targeted by drones. These wounds consist of many small holes, often invisible to X-rays, and burns caused by heat so intense that many cases have required amputation because of the extensive burning.

Friday, April 27, 2007

Israel's lab in Palestine

26 April - 2 May 2007

Disturbing reports allege that Israel is using Gaza as a field to experiment its new lethal weapons, reports Mel Frykberg

Doctors in Gaza have been reporting strange wounds on the bodies of innocent bystanders and those targeted by drones. These wounds consist of many small holes, often invisible to X-rays, and burns caused by heat so intense that many cases have required amputation because of the extensive burning.

Habas Al-Wahid, head of the emergency centre at the Shuhada Al-Aqsa Hospital in Gaza city told the journalists that the legs of the injured were sliced from their bodies "as if a saw was used to cut through the bone." But there was no evidence of ordinary metal shrapnel in or near the wounds.

At Shifa Hospital in Gaza City, Juma Saka said that on examination of the wounds, the doctors had found a powder on the victim's bodies and in their internal organs. Afterwards they removed the microscopic particles which turned out to be carbon and tungsten.

"The powder was like microscopic shrapnel, and this is likely what caused the injuries," Saka said. Complicating the issue was the death of many patients several days afterwards, although they appeared to recover initially. Accusations that Israel is using Gaza and its inhabitants as a laboratory to test new military weapons, have been made from several quarters.

"We don't know what it means -- new weapons or something added to a previous weapon," said Saied Joudda, deputy director at the Kamal Odwan Hospital in Beit Lahiya in the northern Gaza Strip.

To back up their personal experiences, a group of doctors compiled extensive documentary evidence of the extent of the wounds, which occurred specifically in the legs. In other parts of the body, metallic fragments, bigger than the size of the small wounds, were found.

"In our opinion, Israel has also used chemical weapons, such as numerous cases demonstrate, documented cases, with persons having extremely serious burns to their internal organs in the absence of external wounds," said Mouawia, a cardio-vascular surgeon and director-general of emergency services in Gaza.

An investigating team of Italian journalists produced a documentary on Italian state television's satellite channel, RAI News 24, alleging that Israel used dense inert metal explosives (DIME) against Palestinian targets in July and August of last year. This followed journalists taking samples of the microscopic explosives from Gaza and having them tested in a laboratory in Italy.

Carmela Vaccaio, a doctor at the University of Parma, examined samples sent by the Italian reporters from the Gaza Strip and found a high concentration of carbon, as well as copper, aluminium and tungsten, which she considered to be unusual materials. In her report she concluded, "these findings could be in line with the hypothesis that the weapon in question is DIME. The same investigating team also exposed the US military's use of white phosphorus against civilians during attacks on Falluja in Iraq.

Similar accusations were made against Israel during the Lebanon war, when the Jewish state originally denied using phosphorous against Lebanese civilians. But several days later, following the explosive allegations of the Italian journalists and with overwhelming evidence, Israeli cabinet minister, Jacob Edery confirmed that the Israeli military had in fact made use of phosphorous shells.

Israel is accused of dropping more than a million cluster bombs in the south of Lebanon just a few days before the ceasefire. Since then there have been several Lebanese deaths on a daily basis after people accidentally trod on unexploded shells.

According to military experts, DIME is a carbon-encased missile that shatters on impact into minuscule splinters, at the same time setting off an explosive that shoots blades of energy-charged, heavy metal tungsten alloy (HMTA) powder, such as cobalt and nickel or iron, with a carbon fibre casing. It turns to dust on impact, as it loses inertia very quickly due to air resistance, burning and destroying through a very precise angulation everything within a four-metre range, as opposed to the shrapnel which results from the fragmentation of a metal casing. The designation of the metal as "inert" is due to the metal's non-involvement in the blast, rather than the metal being chemically or biologically inert.

This technology is one of a new range of "low collateral damage" or LCD weapons designed to minimise the damage to nearby property, by confining its increased lethal effects to a restricted space. So it is "ideal for densely populated areas" and "helping the warfighter to prevent the loss of public support," according to its enthusiastic proponents.

Israeli military spokesmen have refused to acknowledge or deny the use of DIME in Gaza, but simply stated that Israel only uses weapons that are legal under international law. The catch is that as DIME is a new weapon, the jury is still out as it still has to be assessed.

However, Yitzhak Ben-Israel, a major-general in the Israel Air Force, and former head of the army's weapons- development programme didn't deny that the Israelis had used DIME in Gaza but went on to explain its credentials.

"The idea behind DIME is to allow the accurate pin- pointing of targets without causing collateral damage to innocent bystanders. This is a technology that allows the striking of very small targets."

This would conveniently fit in with Israel's policy of targeted assassinations, however as the Gaza Strip is so densely populated with nearly 1.5 million people crammed into an area 10 by six miles, the chances of innocent bystanders being hit is very high.

In addition to being seriously maimed, injured and killed, due to the carcinogenic effects of DIME, the number of Palestinians becoming afflicted with cancer will multiply in the long term, in addition to their environment being extensively damaged should the Israelis continue to use this new weapon with impunity.

© Copyright Al-Ahram Weekly. All rights reserved

Al-Ahram Weekly Online

Wednesday, April 25, 2007

Major invasion of Gaza Strip expected

Now why would Israel do that? Oh yah, to avoid the Arab Initiative and “peace process.”
---
(Gaza City) Palestine News Network

Wednesday, 25 April 2007

Sources indicated late Wednesday morning that Israeli forces are preparing to invade parts of the Gaza Strip within hours. The Palestine Observer to United Nations, Dr. Riyad Mansour, said, “The Israeli military build-up, incursions and attacks around the Gaza Strip constitute a clear threat of widespread aggression.”

However, the head of negotiations in the Palestine Liberation Organization, Dr. Sa'eb Erekat, said Wednesday afternoon that contacts had been between the Palestinian, Israeli and American administrations in order to prevent a further deterioration in the situation.

Government spokesperson Ghazi Hamad told the press yesterday that it is impossible to suggest that there is anything resembling a “cease-fire” in play. “The truce has collapsed in light of serious developments, including the intensification of Israeli military operations which have resulted in the killing of many with even more injured,” Hamad said.

Some in the Palestinian government are still calling for calm, but Israeli forces did spend the week invading and killing members of the armed resistance and teenagers. Under the current conditions it is a difficult sell to convince many of the people, including the armed resistance, to not fight back. Egyptian security called today upon the armed resistance to exercise restraint and stop launching projectiles in order to not give pretext for further invasion.

Hamad emphasized the need for “the aggressive practices of the occupation to stop.” He said, “Our people must be protected.” The Government Spokesperson indicated that as the threats of a major Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip continue, consultations among Palestinian forces and factions have been underway since Tuesday.

However as the Al Qassam Brigades Spokesperson in Gaza, Abu Obeiyda, pointed out, Israeli forces “destroyed the truce within hours of it beginning.”

Monday, April 23, 2007

Israel preparing for military offensive in Gaza

author Monday April 23, 2007 12:01author by Wissam Afifah - IMEMC News - translated by Ghassan Bannouraauthor email ghassanb at imemc dot org Report this post to the editors

In a sign of what seems to be a possible Israeli military campaign against the Gaza Strip, Israeli war planes dropped warning leaflets on Monday at dawn in the northern areas of the Gaza Strip, eyewitnesses reported.

The leaflets threatened that if Palestinian resistance groups continued to fire home made Qassam shells at nearby Israeli settlements and towns, the army will invade the Gaza Strip. Witnesses said they saw Israeli army helicopters drop these leaflets.

The Aqsa martyrs brigades, of Fatah, and Al Quds brigades of the Islamic Jihad announced on Monday that they fired several home made shells at the northern Israeli town of Sederot and Ashkelon areas within the Green Line in addition to the shelling of the Israeli army post of Nahal Oz located to the east of Gaza City, in response to the latest Israeli escalation of attacks. The resistance groups renewed their commitment to continue resisting the Israeli army and occupation.

The Islamic Jihad movement reported that the shells its fighters fired have caused the injury of six Israeli soldiers. The Israeli army did not confirmed the number injured. This attack comes after the Israeli army killed nine Palestinians – eight in the West Bank and one in the Gaza strip- in less than 24 hours over the weekend.

The Palestinian factions vowed to respond to "the massacre"- as called by the Palestinian resistance factions. This comes amidst of serious talk of a prisoners swap deal involving the Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit, imprisoned by Palestinian factions in Gaza, in return for the release of Palestinian prisoners through Egyptian mediation.

Israeli war planes carried out an attack on Gaza after Palestinian resistance group fired a home made shell at the Israeli city of Ashkelon which left two slightly injured. So far the number of Palestinians killed since the beginning of the second Intifida- uprising- that started in September 2000, has mounted up to 5669.

The Israeli army ended on the seventh of April the self-restraint policy which it had applied since the declaration of a truce in November 2006 when fighter jets targeted a Palestinian car in Gaza city which belongs to resistance men, killing one and injuring the other.

The latest air strike was implemented based on instructions from the Israeli Defense Minister Amir Peretz, who ordered the army "to respond hard" to the firing of Palestinian home made shells and attempts to plant bombs along the border line of the Gaza Strip. This step comes in the wake of the recommendation of the southern region commander of the Israeli army to launch a military operation against the Gaza Strip under the pretext that there are serious threats to Israel due to the growing level of armaments of Palestinian factions.

The residents of Beit Hanoun, a border town in the northern part of the Gaza Strip, are feared to be the first victims of any possible Israeli military operation in the Gaza Strip. This comes in light of the tense situation in the border areas, and increasing movements of Israeli army tanks and strengthening Israeli presence to east and north of the town.

Thursday, April 12, 2007

Gaza: Israeli daily violence and failing public services

10-04-2007 Interview
Gaza: daily violence and failing public services

On his return to Geneva after heading the ICRC's sub-delegation in Gaza for the past 15 months, Georgios Georgantas answers our questions.

What are the main problems that people living in Gaza face today?

The people of Gaza have to contend with extreme violence and failing public services on a daily basis. Health care, education and other public services have gradually broken down since aid to the Palestinian Authority was suspended in early 2006. Meanwhile, violence has surged as a result of the Israeli military operations, the fighting among Palestinian factions and the rise in ordinary crime.

©ICRC/T. Voeten/il-e-00604
Gaza, Beit Hanoun.
zoom button
click to enlarge
Gaza, Beit Hanoun.
©ICRC/T. Voeten/il-e-00604

How has the armed violence affected people's daily lives?

There are two sources of violence: the military operations conducted by the Israeli army and the internecine fighting among Palestinians.

The Israeli operations consist mainly of incursions into the territory that can result in the isolation of entire neighbourhoods or villages. During these incursions, people can no longer move about freely: they cannot shop, visit a doctor or go to a hospital. Homes are occupied and the owners sometimes no longer have access to food or water.

The main problem caused by the fighting among Palestinian factions is the lack of access to medical care. Ambulances are often delayed at check points or road blocks and cannot collect the wounded and take them to hospitals.

What activities is the ICRC currently carrying out in Gaza?

Above all we strive to reach the people caught up in the violence and bring them vital assistance.

One of our main priorities is to make sure that ambulances can collect the wounded. Another is to provide food and water for all those in need, especially families whose houses have been occupied. We also help repair basic infrastructure so as to restore access to water and electricity.

During the infighting among Palestinians, our main role is to remind the parties of their obligation to spare all medical personnel, ambulances and hospitals.

As an ICRC representation who has just spent 15 months in Gaza, what do you see as the organization's main achievements during that period?

Before I arrived in Gaza, I was afraid that it would be very difficult for the ICRC to carry out its activities in such a highly politicized environment – and one that was the focus of so much media attention. I was afraid that we would have very little room for manoeuvre.

Once I got there, however, I realized that our work ia especially useful in such an environment. Thanks to its professional expertise, the ICRC is able to reach people in need and provide them with essential assistance and protection.

Wednesday, April 4, 2007

Israel: Gaza is no longer occupied, but it still exerts much control

By: GAZA GOODS - Associated Press

RAFAH, Gaza Strip -- Raouf Ziara's love life is in Israel's hands.

When Ziara, a 36-year-old officer in the Palestinian security forces, crossed from Gaza to Egypt in late March to visit his Egyptian wife, he had spent more than a month repeatedly trying to get through a border station that Israel only rarely allows to open.

Now in Cairo, Ziara doesn't know when he'll be able to return. But he knows he'll be doing it alone since Israel has frozen immigration to Gaza, which is why his wife is stuck in Egypt and can't join him.

Despite its withdrawal from Gaza in September 2005, Israel still exerts considerable control over the lives of the 1.4 million Palestinians there by controlling access.

The movement of crops crucial to farmers' livelihoods, the decision on when residents of the coastal strip can leave and when they can come back, permission for a foreign-born spouse to move to Gaza -- it's all still up to Israel.

Yet Israel says it no longer occupies Gaza because it pulled out its soldiers and settlers. Under international law, Israel argues, it has no obligations to Gaza's residents but on its own initiative will try to keep supplies flowing to the crowded, poverty-stricken territory to avert a humanitarian crisis.

"We are no longer an occupying power," said Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman Mark Regev. "The legal responsibilities defined by being an occupying power no longer apply."

For Gaza's residents, a brief period of relatively free movement followed Israel's withdrawal.

But despite those gains, Palestinian militants inside Gaza continued to fire rockets at towns inside Israel, and Israel tightened the borders again. It clamped down further when militants linked to the Islamic movement Hamas tunneled into Israel in June 2006 and abducted a soldier.

Israel says it's now turning the crossings with Gaza into international border points, formalizing its farewell from the territory it captured in the 1967 Six Day War.

It has built a high-tech passenger terminal at the main crossing at Erez -- with signs declaring it a "border control point." From behind bulletproof glass, inspectors issue orders over loudspeakers to travelers making their way through a maze of metal detectors, remote-controlled gates and passport control.

But the United Nations says Gaza remains occupied, arguing that Israel retains control over the crossings and that Gaza and the West Bank constitute one unit. Since the West Bank is still occupied, the U.N. says, so is the rest.

Gisha, an Israeli human rights group, accuses the international community of failing to hold Israel to its responsibilities as an occupier, such as ensuring passage of people and goods from the narrow strip where more than half the people live in poverty and unemployment is 36 percent.

"Israel's failure to uphold those obligations has contributed to a humanitarian crisis in Gaza that is unprecedented in 40 years of occupation," said Gisha director, Sari Bashi.

Despite an agreement between Israel and the Palestinians, brokered by the U.S. in November 2005, movement through the crossing points is far below capacity.

Younis Abu Shabana, who grows chili peppers and tomatoes for export to Europe, said he was able to ship just 250 tons of his 4,000 tons of produce last season. He said he threw away 750 tons that had already been packed, and let the rest rot in the fields.

Israel says it restricts Palestinian movement mainly because of the rocket attacks and the kidnapping of the soldier, Cpl. Gilad Shalit. After the abduction, Israeli troops unleashed a weeks-long military offensive and bombed Gaza's power plant, severely disrupting the electricity supply.

Israel determines who can visit or settle in Gaza through its control over the population registry. Only those on the list get Israeli-issued ID cards crucial for travel in and out of the strip, including through the Gaza-Egypt border that in theory is under Palestinian control.

At Israel's insistence, the 2005 agreement stipulated that only legal Gaza residents can cross that border, along with a limited number of foreigners.

Israel has frozen immigration since the Palestinian uprising erupted in 2000, meaning that foreign-born relatives or spouses such as Ziara's Egyptian wife cannot move to the territory. More than 50,000 Palestinians who came on visitors' permits in the 1990s, following interim peace agreements with Israel, don't have residency rights. If they leave, they won't be allowed back.

In February, the Palestinian Authority began issuing its own ID cards, but Israel doesn't recognize them.

In Gaza City, Issam Helmi, 36, recently waited at the Palestinian Interior Ministry to apply for the local ID for his Ukrainian-born wife, Olga. She came in 1996 as a visitor but wasn't granted residency by Israel. Having overstayed her visa, she took a risk last June by leaving to visit Ukraine. Now she can't come back.

Soon after Israel's pullout, the Palestinians were thrilled to gain control over Gaza's border with Egypt. Passage through the Rafah crossing was relatively easy then, giving Gazans a lifeline to the rest of the world for the first time in decades.

But Israel's policy changed after the Palestinians elected a government led by Hamas, which is responsible for dozens of suicide bombings and remains committed to Israel's destruction. Since Shalit's capture, Israel has allowed the border to open only one-fifth of the time.

Though Israeli inspectors no longer staff the border terminal, Israel controls whether European monitors assigned to Rafah under the crossings agreement can report to work. If the monitors don't show up, the terminal remains closed.

The Israeli Defense Ministry says the crossing has been exploited for smuggling weapons and money to Gaza, and that Israel allows it to open periodically on humanitarian grounds. Regev, the Israeli spokesman, said Israel is acting in line with the crossings agreement.

However, Gisha published a transcript of an August meeting of Israeli security officials in which some participants said closing Rafah should be used as a pressure tactic to try to free Shalit.

The head of the European monitors, Italian Lt. Gen. Pietro Pistolese, has warned that frequently shutting the crossing "only encourages more people to resort to extremism and terror."

Israel notifies Palestinian border officials of a planned opening the night before, and the news is then broadcast on Palestinian TV and radio, usually causing a crush of thousands of people desperate to cross. The terminal can only handle 1,200 people in each direction on any day.

Ziara, the security officer, tries to visit Cairo every three months to see his wife, whom his Egyptian mother selected for him eight years ago.

During the month he spent trying to cross, Ziara left his packed suitcase at a cousin's house a mile from the terminal to try to get in line quickly. One night, he slept in a car at the border hoping to get across, but a thousand others had done the same thing.

"People were paying bribes to pass through before us and there was no order -- it was all chaos," Ziara said. "So I left the car and I crossed the first gate, but the second gate -- I tried to jump over it. Many people were doing the same thing. The (Palestinian) soldiers there fired at us and we all ran away. So I didn't make it."

Like the movement of people, the movement of goods and produce is restricted, with cargo trucks allowed into Israel only through the Karni crossing.

In an attempt to boost exports while addressing Israeli safety concerns, the U.S. has endorsed a plan for the Palestinians' elite Presidential Guard to run their side of Karni and for scanners to speed up security checks.

But the scanners and the guards' barracks still aren't in place. Congress is considering a Bush administration request for $16 million to help with the upgrades.

About 1,200 trucks leave Gaza every month, up from 400 in the fall but still far below the 400 a day envisioned by the U.S.

Mounds of scrap metal along Gaza's main road are one sign of the export squeeze and reflect the poverty of Palestinians, who collect bits and pieces for extra cash.

Trader Ibrahim Barakeh, 32, said he used to export large amounts of the metal, crushed into neat blocks, but new restrictions mean he can get only 100 tons through Karni every year. The backlog sits in large piles on a nearby lot, costing him $1,000 a year for storage.

"We depend on the Israelis," he said. "They have the power in their hands."

Monday, April 2, 2007

A Filter for Life to Save Children in Gaza

April 2, 2007

By Silvia Cattori

A source of life, water has become a major health problem in Gaza.

After the fear, the hunger, now it’s thirst.

Israel diverts 80% of the water resources in the West Bank and Gaza.

After fifty years of appropriating the most fertile and water rich land in Palestine, Israel is diverting Jordan’s water, which has given rise to reactions on the part of the UN. Since the 60s and the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza, Israel has profited by controlling the water resources of its neighbours. Sixty-five percent of water consumed by Israel comes from deep layers in the West Bank, Gaza, Jordan, and the Golan Heights, annexed by force in 1981.

Since the year 2000, Israel has intensified its pillage of both surface and subterranean water through illegal measures. For example: Israel constructed the so-called “security wall” on the interior of Palestinian lands following the traces of basins of water. They also installed wells up to 500 metres deep all along the Gaza to take up water that from time immemorial flowed in the natural reservoir of Gush-Katif.

The intensive pumping effected by Israel has thrown the hydrostatic balance in disequilibrium. The result: in the Gaza Strip, seawater has infiltrated into the water layer. Today, 90% of the tap water coming from that layer is salty and utterly undrinkable, and homes only have access to water a few hours a day.

In the north of Gaza, where there is no separation between the water layers and dirty water, the sanitary situation linked to contaminated water has become extremely aggravated. The people are forced to drink this water, giving rise to an important increase in associated diseases, above all in children.

Well-to-do Palestinians have the means to buy bottled water. There are many religious charity organizations that have built their own water filtration stations and take it upon themselves to distribute small quantities of water to the most impoverished. Moreover, several municipalities have built their own filtration plants and have installed faucets where people can go to fill their water containers. But this doesn’t cover the entire population.

We think it is important to support the project Drinking Water in order to protect the health of these poorest inhabitants of Gaza, those who are the most touched by malnutrition.

The objective of this small project, A "Filter for Life", is modest but vital.

Contaminated and brackish water compromises the health of tens of thousands of the poorest people who have no other choice but to drink this water. A "Filter for Life" seeks to offer to the families of Gaza that live in the neighbourhoods where the water is dirty and polluted, an individual filter that purifies and desalinates tap water.

Every penny donated will go to the purchase of filters. The first beneficiaries: the poorest families, who because they lack the means to buy bottled water, must drink water that is salty and highly polluted. A donation is a way to protect those who are the most vulnerable, such as children, from a slow death.

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Here comes the flood: Tsunami in Gaza, Celebration of peace in Jerusalem

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

By Gilad Atzmon

US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice announced yesterday the decision of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Palestinian Authority Chairman, Mahmoud Abbas to meet bi-weekly with the US mediating. Indeed ‘great news for the Palestinians and the Israelis’.

More or less at the same time at least five Palestinians drowned in a “sewage Tsunami” when a water treatment reservoir burst, flooding Umm Naser, a village in the northern Gaza Strip.

While in a peaceful news conference in Jerusalem Rice once again said NO to the democratically elected Hamas referring to the PA chairman as a “partner for peace”, a Bedouin village in Gaza was submerged in sewage.

This devastating picture of total surreal detachment between the two events, between a meaningless political intercourse and a devastating destruction on the ground is the true reality of the Palestinian disaster. This reflects upon the zero Western political leadership’s commitment to humanist and ethical thinking, it reflects upon our abandonment of the Palestinian people, it is a reminder of our general negligence towards people who are mercilessly dispossessed for six decades, our blindness towards what seems to be a suffering with no end and no limit.

Rice called on regional Arab states to “participate actively in the peace process”. She welcomed as well the Saudi peace plan as “an example of such new thinking.” And I end up asking myself when was the last time Rice or the Saudi Crown family had been submerged in Sewage? Rice probably failed to realise that people, who happen to be flooded by ‘treated water’, want something slightly more significant than a mere ‘peace process’. Ms Rice, shouldn’t we better start with food? In case you didn’t realise, your embargo on the Hamas government has led to unprecedented starvation in Gaza. Some 80% of Gaza’s population relies upon WFP’s aid and on that from the UNRWA, the UN agency for refugees.

More or less by the time the US Secretary of State concluded that the two leaders would discuss a “political horizon,” it was clear that dozens of residents of Umm Naser were still unaccounted for.

By late afternoon, receding floodwaters had left a foul-smelling muck. Village children clung to wooden doors floating on the putrid waters. Rescuers were paddling through the village searching for victims. Frantic goats and cows were seen swimming in the mud searching for safe ground.

By the time Rice left the region it was revealed that the ‘negotiations’ between Ehud Olmert and Mahmoud Abbas will not include the three core issues - Jerusalem, refugees and borders. How surprising.

Instead of going from Jerusalem to Riyadh, Rice went back to Washington. She realised that she had nothing to offer the Arab leaders summit. She has nothing to offer almost as much as the people of Umm Naser have nothing to lose.

Thursday, March 22, 2007

Gaza Strip


Some realities of Life in Palestine, Gaza Strip.

In January of 2001, American director James Longley traveled to the Gaza Strip. His plan was to stay for two weeks to collect preliminary material for a documentary film on the Palestinian Intifada. It was during his stay that Ariel Sharon was elected as Israeli Prime Minister. As violence erupted around him, Longley threw away his return ticket and filmed for the next three months, acquiring nearly 75 hours of footage. Gaza Strip, his first feature documentary, is an extraordinary and painful journey into the lives of Palestinians in the Gaza Strip struggling with the day-to-day trials of the Israeli occupation. Filmed in verité style and without narration, Gaza Strip at last gives voice to a population largely ignored by mainstream media.

Reviews
Film Threat, Hollywood's Indie Voice
"Deserves merit and attention...one of the most important documentaries of recent times."

A.O. Scott, The New York Times
"...there are moments in "Gaza Strip" that disclose a wrenching human reality deeper and more basic than any politics."

Washington Report on Middle East Affairs
"An unflinchingly honest portrayal of a population under siege…deserves the widest possible audience."

Daily Star
"Beautiful, heartbreaking, raw and revealing…"

Amazon.com: Gaza Strip: DVD: James Longley




Tuesday, February 27, 2007

Irish bishops: Israel has turned Gaza Strip into a 'large prison'

Last update - 19:47 27/02/2007

By The Associated Press

A group of Irish Roman Catholic bishops on Tuesday called into question Ireland's commercial ties with Israel, saying Israel has made the Gaza Strip "little more than a large prison" for Palestinians.

"Where there is evidence of systematic abuse of human rights on a large scale, as in the Occupied Territories, there are questions that must be asked concerning the appropriateness of maintaining close business, cultural and commercial links with Israel," said auxiliary Bishop of Dublin Raymond Field.

There is a long history of support for Palestinians in Ireland, particularly among nationalist parties such as Sinn Fein, which equate their own fight to end British rule in Ireland with the desire by Palestinians for their own state.

Field, chairman of the Irish Commission for Justice and Social Affairs (ICJSA), which advises Ireland's top Catholic clerics on social issues, described travel restrictions on Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza as an "injustice."

"We are calling for an end to restrictions on family reunification, and an end to humiliating treatment of people at checkpoints," Field said in an ICJSA statement ahead of a meeting with Irish Foreign Minister Dermot Ahern.

Field said restrictions, which Israel says protect it against Palestinian attacks, also make it difficult for Christians to worship at Bethlehem's Church of the Nativity and the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem.

"In effect, the communities of Bethlehem and East Jerusalem are forced to live divided by a 25 foot wall," said Field.

"We also intend to raise with Minister Ahern the intolerable situation that is the daily lot of the Palestinians who live in Gaza," Field said.

The ICJSA's statement also questioned the way in which the European Union handled its dealings with Israel.

"While we welcome cooperation between the EU and its neighbouring countries, nevertheless such cooperation should not be at the expense of a large segment of the indigenous population - in this case the Palestinians."

Monday, February 26, 2007

Court asked: Israel still 'occupying' Gaza?

from the February 26, 2007 edition

Israel's Supreme Court must weigh the country's security concerns against Palestinians' commercial livelihood.

| Correspondent of The Christian Science Monitor

US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice last week held up improvements in Gaza's only commercial link to the outside world as evidence of progress in Israeli-Palestinian relations.

But Sunday the Karni crossing at the Israel-Gaza border became the focus of a dispute in Israel's Supreme Court between human rights groups and the government. At issue: Does Israel have a responsibility to alleviate delays – lasting up to three months – in imported goods?

The debate highlights Gaza's murky legal status and whether Israel's control over the impoverished strip's key access points still determines it as an occupying power, even though it withdrew troops a year and a half ago.

The Supreme Court has yet to rule on the petition, submitted when Israel had shut down most crossings amid a military offensive there.

Human rights groups say Israel exercises an "invisible hand" in Gazans' daily lives because it can regulate commercial goods coming or leaving the territory. "The only way Gaza residents can receive a crate of milk ... and a shipment of medicines is through Israeli-controlled crossings,' " says Sari Bashi, the director of Gisha, an Israeli human rights group that cosponsored the petition. "Only Israel can fulfill this obligation to the residents of Gaza."

According to a Palestinian commercial group, the Karni crossing was open an average of five hours a day in December, despite Israel's commitment under a US-brokered accord on borders and access to ensure "continuous" operationover the terminal. Some 182 trucks carrying goods have been allowed in each day in the last half of 2006, compared with nearly twice that number in February 2006.

Still, both sides agree that commercial traffic has recovered in recent weeks – prompting Ms. Rice to cite the flow of goods at Karni to counter an impression that the Israeli-Palestinian peace process was stuck.

In November 2005, Israelis and Palestinians agreed to expand operation at Karni and Gaza's civilian crossing with Egypt at Rafah. Although Israel recently pledged to expand the hours at Karni, inspectors lacked funds to work at the crossing for more than one shift.

The dispute over Gaza's crossings underscores the tradeoff between Israeli security needs and the Palestinian need for the passage of people and commercial goods. In an affidavit submitted to the court, the Palestinian water utility said Gaza's main north-south highway has been flooded by sewage because Israeli authorities haven't let through the needed pipes. An Israeli army official, said that the pipe infrastructure has been dug up by militants and used in Kassam rockets to fire into Israel.

Gisha argued in January that Israel's occupation in Gaza remains in force. It claims that Israel controls everything from land crossings to tax policy to the Gaza population registry.

According to the 1907 Hague Convention on war, the litmus test to determine foreign occupation is whether an outside power exercises "effective control" over another territory.

Israel argues that it no longer occupies the Gaza Strip, having pulled out its last soldiers in September 2005. It points out that it has even turned its civilian passage with Gaza, the Erez crossing, into an international border terminal.

Israel blames the Palestinians for their economic hardship, citing continued cross- border rocket fire and the Hamas-led Palestinian government, which refuses to meet international conditions for budgetary aid.

"The claim that Israel retains effective control today is to ignore reality," says Mark Regev, a spokesman for the Israeli Foreign Ministry.

The Israeli-Palestinian peace accords in the 1990s defined the Gaza Strip and the West Bank as a single political unit, challenging Israel's claim to have ended the occupation in one area.

"It was a partial evacuation,' " says Yoram Dinstein, an expert on international law at Tel Aviv University. "There are remnants of the occupation, and access is one of those remnants."

Friday, February 9, 2007

Israel gearing up for large Gaza operation

Last update - 16:58 04/02/2007

Peres: Israel must not intervene in Palestinian infighting in Gaza

By Amos Harel and Avi Issacharoff, Haaretz Correspondents, Haaretz Service and AP

Vice Premier Shimon Peres on Sunday said Israel must not intervene in the internal Palestinian fighting in the Gaza Strip, saying that to do so would risk uniting the feuding Palestinians against it.

Since Thursday, 27 Palestinians have died in Gaza fighting between the ruling Hamas party and Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas' Fatah party.

Some Israeli officials, concerned that the conflict could boil over into a fresh spate of attacks on Israel, advocate a major ground offensive to strike the militants first.

"We need to leave Gaza to the Gazans," Peres told Army Radio. "Our intervention will not help, on the contrary, it will draw all the fire toward Israel. We need to leave the Gazans to deal with it and hope that it settles itself."

Peres' comments came in response to reports of the Israel Defense Forces' accelerated planning of a possible extended military operation in Gaza.

Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert told his Cabinet on Sunday that Israel was not involved in violence in Gaza, according to a participant in the meeting.

"We have no hand, no involvement in the Palestinian fighting. It is an internal matter about which we are not happy," Plmert said, according to the participant.

Top military sources said Sunday that the escalation of internecine violence was liable to extend to anti-Israel violence. They said no operation was slated to take place immediately, but that IDF activity in Gaza - similar to the 2002 Operation Defensive Shield in the West Bank - may become necessary.

Foreign Ministry Director-General Aharon Abramovich said "there is no doubt we are in the midst of a difficult period."

He said Israel was watching the violence and was concerned at continued weapons smuggling into Gaza as well as rocket fire into Israel despite a November 26 truce.

"It is very important to us to be able to achieve dialogue rather than a military confrontation with the Palestinians. This is what Israel and the international community aim for and I hope this is the line that triumphs," Abramovich said.

The IDF and Shin Bet security service are particularly concerned by the possibility that Hamas will resume suicide bombings or other attacks on Israel, possibly due to accusations that Israel is supporting Fatah, which it is not overtly doing.

Hamas is also accumulating large quantities of Qassam rockets, whose range, accuracy and strength have improved since Israel's withdrawal from Gaza in the summer of 2005. Hamas and Islamic Jihad are thought to have rockets with a range of 15 to 16 kilometers.

27 Palestinians were killed in clashes on Friday and Saturday, most of them affiliated with Fatah, and at least eight were wounded on Saturday. Ten Fatah and Hamas operatives were kidnapped in Gaza and the West Bank over the weekend. Fatah torched Islamic University buildings Friday, and Hamas torched buildings at the Fatah-affiliated Al-Quds Open University.

Meanwhile, Abbas and Khaled Meshal, the head of Hamas' political bureau in Damascus, agreed Friday on an immediate cease-fire in the Gaza Strip, but it was not immediately implemented and the fighting continued over the weekend.

Abbas and Meshal are slated to meet in Mecca, Saudi Arabia on Tuesday to discuss the establishment of a national unity government. Senior officials in Hamas and Fatah said that despite the recent violence between the two groups, an agreement might be reached Tuesday that would leave Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh in his post and would give three portfolios to members of neither organization. Fatah officials said they were worried that the violence would escalate if no agreement is reached Tuesday.

Israel currently has no plans to get involved in the fighting between Fatah and Hamas. The violence there has not yet negatively affected the security situation on the Gaza-Israel border, and there has even been a decrease in the number of Qassam rockets that Palestinians have fired at the Negev. Although Islamic Jihad is continuing to plan terror attacks against Israelis, Hamas and Fatah appear to be too occupied with their conflict to attack Israel.

Fatah and Hamas officials agreed in principle on Friday to renew the cease-fire reached the day before, and Haniyeh on Saturday called on all armed men to withdraw from the streets of Gaza. The Palestinian interior minister, a Hamas member, said the groups had agreed to get the gunmen off the streets, remove roadblocks and stop the incitement against each other. However, the roadblocks were not removed and the militants who had been abducted during the fighting were not returned immediately after the truce was renewed.

Fatah allegedly arrests Iranian experts
Israeli security officials on Saturday were having difficulty ascertaining the credibility of Fatah allegations that the group had arrested seven Iranian terrorism experts who had been assisting Hamas.

Fatah said Thursday that it had arrested the Iranians during a raid of the Islamic University, a Hamas stronghold in Gaza City. Hamas has denied the allegation, and Fatah spokesmen would not confirm the report on Friday.

Israeli officials believe Fatah is making an effort to play down the story, either because the initial report was wrong, or because it is true and Fatah is concerned that the capture of the Iranians will get it entangled with the Iranian government.

Israeli security officials said Iranian experts, along with Hezbollah operatives and Palestinians who underwent terrorism training in Iran or Lebanon, have entered the Gaza Strip through Rafah in the last few months. Some arrived via underground tunnels, while others came in through the Gaza-Egypt border.

Tuesday, February 6, 2007

Israel prepares for Gaza massacre - report

Israel prepares for possible Gaza incursion - report

JERUSALEM: Israel has stepped up preparations for a possible military incursion into Gaza over concerns that fighting between Palestinian factions may lead to renewed attacks on Israel, a newspaper has reported.

The Haaretz daily quoted senior military sources as saying that such a raid was not an immediate possibility but part of a contingency plan in case the violence escalated further.

More than 80 Palestinians have been killed in fighting that has erupted between rival factions Fatah and Hamas after unity government talks stalled and President Mahmoud Abbas of Fatah called for new elections.

The fighting continued on Saturday despite a new ceasefire deal.

Asked about the Haaretz report, Israeli Foreign Ministry Director-General Aharon Abramovitch said "there is no doubt we are in a difficult period".

He said Israel was watching the violence and was concerned at continued weapons smuggling into Gaza as well as sporadic rocket fire at Israel despite a November 26 truce.

"It is very important to us to be able to achieve dialogue rather than a military confrontation with the Palestinians. This is what Israel and the international community aim for and I hope this is the line that triumphs," Abramovitch said.

The quartet of Middle East peace negotiators on Friday reaffirmed an international aid embargo on the Hamas-ruled Palestinian government. The sanctions were imposed to pressure the militant group to renounce violence, recognise Israel and abide by interim peace deals.

The quartet, comprising the United States, the European Union, the United Nations and Russia, also voiced "deep concern" at the continued fighting between Fatah and Hamas.

Washington has plans to expand its assistance to bolster Abbas' security forces.

Documents obtained by Reuters on Saturday show an $US86 million US programme will provide support to 8500 of Abbas' national security forces and to his nearly 4000-member presidential guard.

Thursday, January 18, 2007

Israel's 'invisible hand' in Gaza

By Alan Johnston
BBC News, Gaza

Although Israel withdrew from Gaza more than a year ago, its control over the lives of Palestinians there is in some ways even tighter than before, a new report by an Israeli human rights organisation says.
In the days after Israeli troops and settlers pulled out of the territory, the then Israeli leader, Ariel Sharon addressed the United Nations.

He declared "the end of Israeli control over and responsibility for the Gaza Strip".

But a study by Gisha challenges that claim. The organisation says it aims to "protect the fundamental rights of Palestinians living in the Occupied Territories by imposing human rights law as a limitation on the behaviour of Israel's military".

"Israel continues to control Gaza through an 'invisible hand'," the organisation says, in a detailed, 100-page report.



Gaza residents know that significant aspects of their lives depend on decisions made by Israel's military
Gisha report

"In contrast to the rhetoric used to describe the disengagement plan, Israel has not relinquished control over Gaza but rather removed some elements of control while tightening other significant controls."

Gisha argues that this means that Israel still has extensive legal obligations for the wellbeing of the territory's population that are not being met.

It says: "Gaza residents know that significant aspects of their lives - the ability to exit or enter Gaza, the supply of medicine, fuel and other basic goods, the possibility to transport crops to export markets, the ability to use electric lights - depend on decisions made by Israel's military."


My husband's ID card says he is married, but the box for spouse's name is blank. My children were born in Gaza to a mother who, officially, does not exist
Mirvat Alnahal
Palestinian lawyer with no ID

The report begins by referring to the continued, overt military pressure on Gaza.
Until the ceasefire declared in November, Israeli air raids, artillery fire and armoured incursions led to the deaths of hundreds of Palestinians.

This was all part of the army's confrontation with militant groups - like the Islamic Jihad organisation - which are based in Gaza.

On an almost daily basis they launch crudely made missiles at towns and villages in neighbouring southern Israel - often describing their attacks as retaliation for Israeli army actions in the occupied West Bank.

Less visible controls

But the new study focuses more on the much less visible forms of continuing Israeli control over Gaza.


GISHA: REMAINING CONTROLS
Military pressure
Effective control over Rafah crossing with Egypt, and frequent closure of Karni border crossing with Israel
Air and sea blockade
Control of Palestinian population registry
Control over aspects of areas of the Palestinian tax system


There is an air blockade. Israel has not allowed Gaza's international airport to re-open.

The Israeli navy continues to patrol the coastline in what it says in an effort to prevent arms smuggling. Palestinian fishing boats are sometimes fired on for straying outside Israeli-imposed zones.

The Israelis have also been able to maintain control over all Gaza's land links with the outside world - including the territory's border with Egypt.

There are no Israeli troops on the frontier any longer, but Israel's co-operation is required for the border crossing to function under an agreement struck between Israel, the Palestinian Authority, Egypt and the European Union.

That Israeli co-operation has frequently been withdrawn, and the border was closed for nearly half of the first year after Israel pulled out of Gaza.

Israeli control over the flow of goods in and out of the territory remains total. And frequent closures of the main cargo terminal at the Karni crossing point have had a devastating impact on the Gazan economy.

Security threats

The Israelis say the restrictions have been necessary on account of continual security threats. Two years ago there was an attack by militants at Karni that left several Israelis dead.


We would argue that to say legally that Israel has control of what goes on inside the Gaza Strip when there are no Israeli police, soldiers or civilians there is very far fetched
Israeli foreign ministry

But Palestinians believe that the border closures are part of a deliberate effort to maintain pressure on Gaza by strangling its economy.

The report also highlights a range of administrative controls.

It points out that Israel has retained control of the Palestinian population registry. This enables it to decide who can be a resident of Gaza - and who can come and go.

The reports says that tens of thousands of people have been barred from the registry and consequently have no identity papers.

The study sites the case of Mirvat Alnahal, a lawyer of Palestinian origin and who has lived in Gaza since the mid-1990s.

"I am trapped here. I cannot leave for fear that I won't be allowed to return," she says.

"My husband's ID card says he is married, but the box for spouse's name is blank. My children were born in Gaza to a mother who, officially, does not exist."

Crippled economy

The report stresses the importance of Israel's continuing control over areas of the Palestinian tax system.

And in its effort to apply pressure on the Hamas government, Israel has withheld payment of tax revenue it owes the Palestinians worth hundreds of millions of dollars.

The report points out that this has had a crippling impact on the services that the government has been able to provide - and the policy has constituted another example of Israel's ability to continue to exert significant control in Gaza.

The study ends by saying that despite the withdrawal of its soldiers, Israel's role in the territory means that it remains bound under international and humanitarian law to allow freedoms of movement and economic activity.

With continuing control comes continuing legal responsibility, the report says.

The Israeli government has completely rejected this conclusion.

Responding to the study, a foreign ministry spokesman said: "We would argue that to say legally that Israel has control of what goes on inside the Gaza Strip when there are no Israeli police, soldiers or civilians there is very far fetched.

"It doesn't hold water under international law."

Thursday, January 11, 2007

Palestine 2007: Genocide in Gaza, Ethnic Cleansing in the West Bank

Ilan Pappe, The Electronic Intifada, 11 January 2007

A general view of Har Homa settlement, built on the land of West Bank city of Bethlehem, and considered by Israel to be part of 'Greater Jerusalem', 29 November 2006. (MaanImages/Magnus Johansson)

On this stage, not so long ago, I claimed that Israel is conducting genocidal policies in the Gaza Strip. I hesitated a lot before using this very charged term and yet decided to adopt it. Indeed, the responses I received, including from some leading human rights activists, indicated a certain unease over the usage of such a term. I was inclined to rethink the term for a while, but came back to employing it today with even stronger conviction: it is the only appropriate way to describe what the Israeli army is doing in the Gaza Strip.

On 28 December 2006, the Israeli human rights organization B'Tselem published its annual report about the Israeli atrocities in the occupied territories. Israeli forces killed this last year six hundred and sixty citizens. The number of Palestinians killed by Israel last year tripled in comparison to the previous year (around two hundred). According to B'Tselem, the Israelis killed one hundred and forty one children in the last year. Most of the dead are from the Gaza Strip, where the Israeli forces demolished almost 300 houses and slew entire families. This means that since 2000, Israeli forces killed almost four thousand Palestinians, half of them children; more than twenty thousand were wounded.

B'Tselem is a conservative organization, and the numbers may be higher. But the point is not just about the escalating intentional killing, it is about the trend and the strategy. As 2007 commences, Israeli policymakers are facing two very different realities in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. In the former, they are closer than ever to finishing the construction of their eastern border. Their internal ideological debate is over and their master plan for annexing half of the West Bank is being implemented at an ever-growing speed. The last phase was delayed due to the promises made by Israel, under the Road Map, not to build new settlements. Israel found two ways of circumventing this alleged prohibition. First, it defined a third of the West Bank as Greater Jerusalem, which allowed it to build within this new annexed area towns and community centers. Secondly, it expanded old settlements to such proportions so that there was no need to build new ones. This trend was given an additional push in 2006 (hundreds of caravans were installed to mark the border of the expansions, the planning schemes for the new towns and neighborhoods were finalized and the apartheid bypass roads and highway system completed). In all, the settlements, the army bases, the roads and the wall will allow Israel to annex almost half of the West Bank by 2010. Within these territories there will be a considerable number of Palestinians, against whom the Israeli authorities will continue to implement slow and creeping transfer policies -- too boring as a subject for the western media to bother with and too elusive for human rights organizations to make a general point about them. There is no rush; as far as the Israelis are concerned, they have the upper hand there: the daily abusive and dehumanizing mixed mechanisms of army and bureaucracy is as effective as ever in contributing its own share to the dispossession process.

The strategic thinking of Ariel Sharon that this policy is far better than the one offered by the blunt 'transferists' or ethnic cleansers, such as Avigdor Liberman's advocacy, is accepted by everyone in the government, from Labor to Kadima. The petit crimes of state terrorism are also effective as they enable liberal Zionists around the world to softly condemn Israel and yet categorize any genuine criticism on Israel's criminal policies as anti-Semitism.

On the other hand, there is no clear Israeli strategy as yet for the Gaza Strip; but there is a daily experiment with one. Gaza, in the eyes of the Israelis, is a very different geo-political entity from that of the West Bank. Hamas controls Gaza, while Abu Mazen seems to run the fragmented West Bank with Israeli and American blessing. There is no chunk of land in Gaza that Israel covets and there is no hinterland, like Jordan, to which the Palestinians of Gaza can be expelled. Ethnic cleansing is ineffective here.

The earlier strategy in Gaza was ghettoizing the Palestinians there, but this is not working. The ghettoized community continues to express its will for life by firing primitive missiles into Israel. Ghettoizing or quarantining unwanted communities, even if they were regarded as sub-human or dangerous, never worked in history as a solution. The Jews know it best from their own history. The next stages against such communities in the past were even more horrific and barbaric. It is difficult to tell what the future holds for the Gaza population, ghettoized, quarantined, unwanted and demonized. Will it be a repeat of the ominous historical examples or is a better fate still possible?

Creating the prison and throwing the key to the sea, as UN Special Reporter John Dugard has put it, was an option the Palestinians in Gaza reacted against with force as soon as September 2005. They were determined to show at the very least that they were still part of the West Bank and Palestine. In that month, they launched the first significant, in number and not quality, barrage of missiles into the Western Negev. The shelling was a response to an Israeli campaign of mass arrests of Hamas and Islamic Jihad activists in the Tul Karem area. The Israelis responded with operation 'First Rain'. It is worth dwelling for a moment on the nature of that operation. It was inspired by the punitive measures inflicted first by colonialist powers, and then by dictatorships, against rebellious imprisoned or banished communities. A frightening show of the oppressor's power to intimidate preceded all kind of collective and brutal punishments, ending with a large number of dead and wounded among the victims. In 'First Rain', supersonic flights were flown over Gaza to terrorize the entire population, succeeded by the heavy bombardment of vast areas from the sea, sky and land. The logic, the Israeli army explained, was to create pressure so as to weaken the Gaza community's support for the rocket launchers. As was expected, by the Israelis as well, the operation only increased the support for the rocket launchers and gave impetus to their next attempt. The real purpose of that particular operation was experimental. The Israeli generals wished to know how such operations would be received at home, in the region and in the world. And it seems that instantly the answer was 'very well'; namely, no one took an interest in the scores of dead and hundreds of wounded Palestinians left behind after the 'First Rain' subsided.

The bar set continually higher: Palestinians pass by a pool of blood after the Israeli shelling of a residential area in Beit Hanoun in the northern of Gaza Strip in which at least 18 people were killed, 8 November 2006. (MaanImages/Wesam Saleh)

And hence since 'First Rain' and until June 2006, all the following operations were similarly modeled. The difference was in their escalation: more firepower, more causalities and more collateral damage and, as to be expected, more Qassam missiles in response. Accompanying measures in 2006 were more sinister means of ensuring the full imprisonment of the people of Gaza through boycott and blockade, with which the EU is still shamefully collaborating.

The capture of Gilad Shalit in June 2006 was irrelevant in the general scheme of things, but nonetheless provided an opportunity for the Israelis to escalate even more the components of the tactical and allegedly punitive missions. After all, there was still no strategy that followed the tactical decision of Ariel Sharon to take out 8,000 settlers whose presence complicated 'punitive' missions and whose eviction made him almost a candidate for the Nobel Peace Prize. Since then, the 'punitive' actions continue and become themselves a strategy.

The Israeli army loves drama and therefore also escalated the language. 'First Rain' was replaced by 'Summer Rains', a general name that was given to the 'punitive' operations since June 2006 (in a country where there is no rain in the summer, the only precipitation that one can expect are showers of F-16 bombs and artillery shells hitting people of Gaza).

'Summer Rains' brought a novel component: the land invasion into parts of the Gaza Strip. This enabled the army to kill citizens even more effectively and to present it as a result of heavy fighting within dense populated areas, an inevitable result of the circumstances and not of Israeli policies. With the close of summer came operation 'Autumn Clouds' which was even more efficient: on 1 November 2006, in less than 48 hours, the Israelis killed seventy civilians; by the end of that month, with additional mini operations accompanying it, almost two hundred were killed, half of them children and women. As one can see from the dates, some of the activity was parallel to the Israeli attacks on Lebanon, making it easier to complete the operations without much external attention, let alone criticism.

From 'First Rain' to 'Autumn Clouds' one can see escalation in every parameter. The first is the disappearance of the distinction between civilian and non-civilian targets: the senseless killing has turned the population at large to the main target for the army's operation. The second one is the escalation in the means: employment of every possible killing machines the Israeli army possesses. Thirdly, the escalation is conspicuous in the number of casualties: with each operation, and each future operation, a much larger number of people are likely to be killed and wounded. Finally, and most importantly, the operations become a strategy -- the way Israel intends to solve the problem of the Gaza Strip.

A creeping transfer in the West Bank and a measured genocidal policy in the Gaza Strip are the two strategies Israel employs today. From an electoral point of view, the one in Gaza is problematic as it does not reap any tangible results; the West Bank under Abu Mazen is yielding to Israeli pressure and there is no significant force that arrests the Israeli strategy of annexation and dispossession. But Gaza continues to fire back. On the one hand, this would enable the Israeli army to initiate more massive genocidal operations in the future. But there is also the great danger, on the other, that as happened in 1948, the army would demand a more drastic and systematic 'punitive' and collateral action against the besieged people of the Gaza Strip.

A source of satisfaction for Israel: Palestinians inspect a burnt vehicle belonging to Colonel Mohammad Ghareeb, the deputy chief of preventive security in Jabalia refugee camp in the northern Gaza Strip. The vehicle was burnt during factional clashes between Fatah and Hamas. (MaanImages/Wesam Saleh)

Ironically, the Israeli killing machine has rested lately. Even relatively large number of Qassam missiles, including one or two quite deadly ones, did not stir the army to action. Though the army's spokesmen say it shows 'restraint', it never did in the past and is not likely to do so in the future. The army rests, as its generals are content with the internal killing that rages on in Gaza and does the job for them. They watch with satisfaction the emerging civil war in Gaza, which Israel foments and encourages. From Israel's point of view it does not really mater how Gaza would eventually be demographically downsized, be it by internal or Israeli slaying. The responsibility of ending the internal fighting lies of course with the Palestinian groups themselves, but the American and Israeli interference, the continued imprisonment, the starvation and strangulation of Gaza are all factors that make such an internal peace process very difficult. But it will take place soon and then with the first early sign that it subsided, the Israeli 'Summer Rains' will fall down again on the people of Gaza, wreaking havoc and death.

And one should never tire of stating the inevitable political conclusions from this dismal reality of the year we left behind and in the face of the one that awaits us. There is still no other way of stopping Israel than besides boycott, divestment and sanctions. We should all support it clearly, openly, unconditionally, regardless of what the gurus of our world tell us about the efficiency or raison d'etre of such actions. The UN would not intervene in Gaza as it does in Africa; the peace noble laureates would not enlist to its defense as they do for causes in Southeast Asia. The numbers of people killed there are not staggering as far as other calamities are concerned, and it is not a new story -- it is dangerously old and troubling. The only soft point of this killing machine is its oxygen lines to 'western' civilization and public opinion. It is still possible to puncture them and make it at least more difficult for the Israelis to implement their future strategy of eliminating the Palestinian people either by cleansing them in the West Bank or genociding them in the Gaza Strip.


Ilan Pappe is senior lecturer in the University of Haifa Department of political Science and Chair of the Emil Touma Institute for Palestinian Studies in Haifa. His books include, among others, The Making of the Arab-Israeli Conflict (London and New York 1992), The Israel/Palestine Question (London and New York 1999), A History of Modern Palestine (Cambridge 2003), The Modern Middle East (London and New York 2005) and his latest, Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine (2006).
---

Ilan Pappé - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Related Links
  • BY TOPIC: Israel attacks Gaza: "Operation Autumn Clouds" (1 Nov 2006- )
  • BY TOPIC: Massacre in Beit Hanoun (8 November 2006)
  • BY TOPIC: Israel invades Gaza: "Operation Summer Rain" (27 June 2006)
  • BY TOPIC: Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions
  • A rare voice: An interview with author Ilan Pappe, Christopher Brown (11 December 2006)
  • Monday, January 8, 2007

    Life in Gaza -- an account by a Gazan doctor

    With Mona El-Farra, Mohammed Omer, and Amira Hass
    KALW Your Call
    December 28, 2006

    Commentary: Pathetic questions by a silly California interviewer... "what can't you buy in the supermarket..."

    Overview of what is happening in Gaza...

    Tuesday, January 2, 2007

    Fear Is a Powerful Stimulant

    (Part 3)
    Dr. Bill Dienst writing from Gaza, occupied Palestine, Live from Palestine, 31 December 2006

    [...PREVIOUS]

    People fleeing northeast from Beit Lahiya to escape areas receiving fire from Apache attack helicopters. (Dr. Bill Dienst)

    November 18, 2006, continued ...

    Our mobile health van drives just north of Beit Lahiya where we see a large crowd of people fleeing from the attack.

    We drive further north toward the village of Um Nasser, located right on the border with Israel, and right underneath the attack helicopters which are hovering about 1000 meters above us.

    We arrive at the village clinic. Because of the attack helicopters, patients are not showing up to be seen today.

    I am not as scared as I was on the first night at Hotel Al Deira, though we are in a more dangerous spot. I am strangely getting used to this. Fear is a powerful stimulant which makes you feel excited and euphoric about still being alive, when death and destruction are so near, and hopeful that you will remain so. The grief and depression come later as you withdraw from the euphoria. Right now, I am feeling more curious really.

    I ask where we might better view the helicopters. What about the rooftop? Not a good idea, says Dr. Hatem; we might become targets there. We look out from the windows and finally go out in the yard in front of the clinic. We can hide behind the clinic's walls or jump inside if we are threatened. There we have Arabic coffee and cigarettes while we watch the attack helicopters shoot toward the south. We can also hear and see Israeli tanks on the beach to the west of us.

    Patients are not coming, and the choppers finally withdraw, so we head south to Kamal Adwan Hospital in Beit Lahiya to be in the Emergency Room with the trauma team.

    We have time to meet briefly with Dr. Sa'id Joodah who is an orthopedic surgeon and clinical administrator at Kamal Adwan Hospital. We are awaiting the arrival of two youths who were injured a half kilometer away. Triage patterns for trauma victims in the Northern Gaza Strip have evolved such that the main trauma center Al Shifa Hospital in Gaza City handles the brain injury and major chest cases. That is, if there is time to transfer those patients; often there is not, so major chest cases are also handled here.

    In 2002, the Palestinian Authority designated community district hospitals to handle the second tier of trauma care: at hospitals in Rafah, Deir Al Balah in the central Gaza Strip, and here in the Northern Gaza Strip this hospital, Kamal Adwan.

    The reality is that there have been so many traumas here in Northern Gaza that this hospital partners with Al Awda Hospital in Jabalya Refugee Camp. Al Awda is run by the Union of Health Workers Committee, an NGO.

    These hospitals are much more than just primary care hospitals that simple stabilize the trauma patient and transfer. This hospital has a neurosurgical team who are currently in the operating room with a young man suffering from a gunshot wound to his flank and spinal cord.

    This hospital routinely handles both primary and secondary levels of trauma care. It is authorized for 70 beds but handles about 130 inpatients daily, consistently above 100 percent capacity. It has a five bed Intensive Care Unit and is staffed by General Surgery and Internal Medicine specialists. The hospital handles an average of 500 operations per month; its emergency room sees about 230 patients per day.

    Now the two patients are arriving in the ER, so we go there. The first one, Tha'er Al-Masri, age 16 has a gunshot wound through his right neck and is dead on arrival. There is nothing we can do for him. We don't have time to grieve. That will be left to his family.

    Muheed Suleiman, age 20, suffering from a large gunshot wound to his right chest, was resuscitated from hemorrhagic shock at Kamal Adwan Hospital. He was transferred to al-Awda Hospital for emergency surgery because Kamal Adwan's operating rooms were full with other trauma victims from the Israeli tank and Apache attack helicopter assault. (Dr. Bill Dienst)

    Our therapeutic distancing takes us to the next young man whom we may still be able to help, Muheed Suleiman, age 20 who has large gunshot wound to his right chest. The gap in his chest wall was covered in the field. A chest tube is placed while two IV's are started and he receives breathing support through a bag valve mask and then through a breathing tube. He is suffering from severe hemorrhagic shock due to internal bleeding. He is given blood transfusions and I can hear his heartbeat come back with my stethoscope.

    He regains consciousness and tries to sit up and starts fighting the breathing tube so we must sedate him. His heart is beating real fast at 140 beats per minute. He is still in serious trouble and needs an immediate operation to his chest and abdomen to stop the bleeding.

    Unfortunately, the two operating theaters here are already full with two other trauma cases from this same Israeli attack: the young man with spinal cord trauma, and another young man who is having his abdomen opened to stop bleeding. So we put Muheed in an ambulance and transfer him to Al Awda Hospital in Jabalya about half a kilometer away.

    Dr. Sa'id Joodah calls report to the receiving surgeon at Al Awda Hospital and explains the need for immediate thoracotomy and laparotomy. We can only hope and pray now that Muheed will make it.

    Back at Hotel Al Deira, Al Jazeera in English is reporting that three Israeli soldiers were injured by anti-tank weapons. Two Palestinians were killed and three were injured.


    November 19

    Today nine people were injured here in Gaza when an Israeli rocket hit a car. Two Hamas members survived the attack. Last night a family's apartment in Jabalya camp was threatened by phone. The IOF called and stated that it was to be destroyed by rocket attack in a few minutes. Local residents overcame their fear and at least 50 assembled on the rooftop. The IOF called off the attack after deciding that two Gaza massacres in one month would not go over well at the UN.


    November 20

    After a day in Rafah, I go back to Beit Hanoun and Um Nasser Village for a final time. The news from two days ago is not good. Only one of the five Palestinians who were hit during the Israeli helicopter and tank incursion has survived.

    Muheed, the young man we resuscitated from hemorrhagic shock and transferred to Al Awda Hospital, died in surgery as they were unable to control his bleeding in time. Muhammad Abu Jalghoun, the young man was receiving spinal surgery at Kamal Adwan Hospital when we arrived, also died of associated wounds. Sa'id Hujooj is from Um Nasser Village. He died in Beit Lahiya resisting this incursion. We will be attending his funeral wake later today.

    Tha'er Al Masri is the 16-year-old boy we saw dead from a gunshot wound to the neck. Only Abella Keelawnee, the young man undergoing the abdominal operation at Kamal Adwan, has survived.

    Mahmood suffered shrapnel wounds to the chest during the 8 November massacre. Medical relief workers are changing his bandages and checking the wounds for infection. (Dr. Bill Dienst)

    Israeli tanks are on the eastern and northern perimeters of Beit Hanoun as we enter from the southwest. As we treat Mahmood, a 15-year-old suffering from a shrapnel would he received to his chest last week, we can hear a sound volley from artillery shells being fired from a tank in the distance.

    A collection of shrapnel. (Dr. Bill Dienst)

    A member of the al-Ahtamina family suffers a fresh shrapnel wound on top of old wounds from the previous week. (Dr. Bill Dienst)
    A close-up of the shrapnel wound suffered by a member of the al-Athamina family. (Dr. Bill Dienst)


    We return to the al-Athamina family neighborhood and treat a middle aged man for fresh shrapnel wounds to his leg which he received this morning from the tanks. His leg also shows bruising that is over a week old -- this from wounds he received before on the day of the massacre.

    Sa'id Hujooj, age 20, was killed on 18 November while resisting Israeli tanks and helicopters. (Dr. Bill Dienst)

    Now we return to Um Nasser village to attend the wake of Sa'id Hujooj, age 20, who was killed by the IOF.

    The wake for Sa'id Hujooj in the village of Um Nasser on the northern Gaza border with Israel, 20 November. (Dr. Bill Dienst)

    As we approach the wake, we see a banner from Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine (DFLP) which reads in Arabic, "We promise our martyr to continue the Intifada to build the Palestinian State and free Jerusalem."

    As we enter the wake, recordings of the Koran are being sung over the loud speaker in a very spiritual way. If we stand up, we can see Israeli tanks to the north. I am told to sit down so the tanks will not see us.

    Sa'id's friends and family tell me he finished secondary school, was working toward getting a good job and was working on his home and hoping soon to marry. He was a very ethical person who had good relations with his neighbors, both young and old. He always tried to help anyone in need says Dr. Muhammad Ya'aghi, who also remembers he had a constant special smile.

    The brothers of Sa'id Hujooj mourn his loss. (Dr. Bill Dienst)

    His father Abu Khalid says Sa'id was a very good person, sincere and sensitive. Abu Khalid learned about his son's death while he was watching TV and saw Sa'id's body on the news. His mother Um Khalid was in the clinic today complaining of not eating or sleeping for two days and crying. She was treated with tranquilizers and will be referred for grief counseling.

    We head to Beit Lahiya and briefly visit the Muhammad A-Durah Pediatric Hospital, which is named after the young Palestinian boy who was killed in his father's arms by IOF soldiers here in Gaza while his father was trying to protect him in September 2000, during the beginning of the current intifada.

    Like other stimulant drugs, chronic fear and suffering is hazardous to one's health. It stunts normal growth and development and causes chronic psychological problems. It causes premature aging with its consequent adverse health effects. It also produces internecine conflict between Palestinian factions.

    There are elements within the Israeli and American governments who are using perpetual fear here in Gaza and other parts of the Middle East in an attempt to divide-and-conquer; to spark civil war between different Palestinian and Iraqi factions. Then their lackeys in the major media parrot just what they are told by their neoconservative spin doctors.

    They try and imply that Palestinians, Iraqis and other Arabs are simply and inherently violent backward and uncivilized savage-terrorists, thus justifying perpetual Israeli and American occupation -- as if this is some kind of solution, rather than the root cause of this civil strife. Nothing could be further from the truth. One just needs to spend time on the ground here in this environment, under the influence of perpetual fear, to see how it all works.

    Abu Zahid's apartment in Beit Lahiya; the top floor was hit by either tank shells or missiles by Israel the morning the photo was taken. (Dr. Bill Dienst)

    Abu Zahid's house. (Dr. Bill Dienst)
    Abu Zahid's house. (Dr. Bill Dienst)


    On the way home we stop by the apartment of Abu Zahid. This morning, an Israeli rocket hit the top floor of his apartment. Fortunately this floor was still uninhabited. Al-humdulillah!

    No one was hurt, but people were pretty scared. I kick a soccer ball around with some kids downstairs in the alley.

    The PLO Flag Shop in Gaza City - a good place for souvenirs. (Dr. Bill Dienst)

    And then we head back to Gaza City.


    Dr. Bill Dienst is a rural family and emergency room physician from Omak, Washington, USA.


    Related Links
  • BY TOPIC: Israel attacks Gaza: "Operation Autumn Clouds" (1 Nov 2006- )
  • BY TOPIC: Massacre in Beit Hanoun (8 November 2006)
  • BY TOPIC: Israel invades Gaza: "Operation Summer Rain" (27 June 2006)
  • Friday, December 22, 2006

    Heavy fighting continues between Hamas and U.S. backed Fatah faction

    U.S. military officers are running the heavily armed Fatah faction death squads. Most of Fatah is sitting this one out. Hamas is protecting the Palestinians as best they can from these attacks. Israel backs the U.S. and Abbas.
    ---

    Heavy fighting continues between Hamas and Fatah
    Updated Fri. Dec. 22 2006 6:29 AM ET

    Associated Press

    GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip -- Ferocious gunbattles broke out between Hamas and Fatah militants in the Gaza Strip and West Bank early Friday, underscoring the fragility of a new truce between the rival factions. A Hamas militiaman injured in violence that touched off the Gaza City shootout died of his wounds.

    In other tension between the two factions, the office of President Mahmoud Abbas of Fatah blocked five major Hamas appointments to senior government positions earlier this week. Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh of Hamas accused Abbas of trying to subvert the government's authority by refusing to authorize the appointments.

    Abbas' power struggle with Hamas turned violent earlier this month after he declared that efforts to form a more moderate coalition government with the militantly anti-Israel Islamic group had broken down.

    The street battle early Friday in Gaza City, which encompassed Abbas' residence and the home of Foreign Minister Mahmoud Zahar of Hamas, broke out as Hamas militiamen tried to free two fighters kidnapped Thursday.

    In the charged atmosphere pervading Gaza, the firefight quickly spread out of control. Within minutes, it encompassed the presidential guard outside Abbas' house, other security officers in the area and the Hamas militiamen guarding Zahar's home and the nearby Foreign Ministry building.

    Gunmen manning strategic rooftop positions began shooting at other armed men in the streets.

    The presidential guard took up defensive positions behind newly built walls of sandbags and cement block barriers outside the residence of Abbas, who was not in Gaza at the time.

    Hamas officials said Fatah gunmen shot at Zahar's home.

    One witness estimated that more than 2,000 bullets were fired in the first 10 minutes of the shootout, and several rocket-propelled grenades were also launched. Despite the scale and intensity of the fighting, no one was wounded, health officials said.

    Residents of the neighbourhood, the scene of other gunbattles over the past week, said they put their children in bathtubs for protection against stray bullets. Others tucked themselves in corners for safety.

    The violence died down after about 20 minutes as Muslim clerics and other mediators worked to restore calm.

    A Hamas militiaman injured in the course of the kidnapping Thursday, Ayman Jirjawi, died of his wounds early Friday, said Islam Shahwan, a militia spokesman.

    Hamas accused a Fatah-linked clan of carrying out the abduction to avenge the deaths of two clan members in factional fighting in Gaza last week. The fighting left 16 people dead and dozens injured before the truce took effect Tuesday night.

    The internal violence has been mostly confined to Gaza, but fighting spilled over to the West Bank town of Nablus Friday morning. Witnesses and medics said about a dozen gunmen from Hamas and Fatah clashed near a soccer stadium where Hamas men were preparing for a rally. Palestinian medics said a bystander was wounded in the crossfire.

    Terrified residents huddled in their homes.

    Tiham Tufah, who lives near the stadium, said she hid with her husband and two daughters in their living room. "We feel caught in the middle of a big war, and we are really afraid,'' Tufah said. "We can't leave the house or look out the window. We live in fear.''

    The factional fighting _ the violent mirror of Abbas' power struggle with Hamas _ also played out on the bureaucratic level Friday. In a letter to the office of Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh of Hamas, Abbas chief of staff Rafiq Husseini said five proposed Hamas appointments were illegal, in some cases because the positions were not actually vacant or did not exist.

    The letter said other proposed appointments would be blocked on the same ground.

    In a related development, a top Abbas aide, Azzam al-Ahmed, reiterated the Palestinian president's offer on Thursday to resume coalition talks with Hamas, but said it would only be good for a week or two.

    Abbas had hoped a more moderate coalition between Hamas and his Fatah would allow the West to resume desperately needed aid, cut off to pressure the Hamas government to recognize Israel and renounce violence.

    The Palestinian infighting coincided with stepped-up Palestinian rocket attacks on Israel, destabilizing a shaky ceasefire between militant factions and Israel.

    One rocket was fired early Friday, in addition to six launched on Thursday. The attacks Thursday caused no injuries to Israelis, but wounded three Palestinian children when a rocket veered off course, hospital officials and a relative said.

    Israeli officials say Palestinian militants have fired nearly 50 rockets since the Nov. 26 truce took effect. Israel has not retaliated, but Prime Minister Ehud Olmert warned this week that his patience was wearing thin.

    Wednesday, December 20, 2006

    Fighters withdraw from Gaza

    New Hamas-Fatah ceasefire tentatively holds
    ---
    Staff and agencies
    Wednesday December 20, 2006
    Guardian Unlimited

    Rival forces loyal to Hamas and Fatah withdrew from the streets of Gaza City today as a new Palestinian ceasefire tentatively held.

    The ceasefire followed the deaths of 10 people in fierce fighting since the weekend.

    Simmering tensions erupted when the Palestinian president, Fatah's Mahmoud Abbas, called for new elections to end a political deadlock with the Hamas government.

    Tony Blair strongly backed his stance during talks in the West Bank on Monday, but Hamas says the call for elections amounts to a coup by Mr Abbas.

    The violence - the worst between Palestinian factions in a decade - has threatened to escalate into civil conflict.

    In a video message broadcast today, the deputy leader of al-Qaida rejected the call for new elections and called for holy war.

    "Any way other than holy war will lead us only to loss and defeat," Ayman al-Zawahri said in the video, broadcast by the al-Jazeera television channel.

    "Those who are trying to liberate the Islamic territories through elections based on secular constitutions, or on decisions to hand over Palestine to the Jews, will not liberate one grain of sand of Palestine."

    Today's Egyptian-brokered ceasefire came 24 hours after a previous truce broke down when heavily armed Fatah and Hamas forces exchanged gunfire on the streets of Gaza.

    Two Fatah fighters injured in yesterday's violence have died from their wounds, family members said.

    Fatah immediately accused Hamas of violating the latest truce. "Unless Hamas stops its violations, the second agreement ... could be in danger," Tawfiq Abu Khoussa, a Fatah spokesman, said.

    The Palestinian crisis developed after the more radical Hamas, which both the EU and US consider to be a terrorist group, won elections in January.

    In the face of an economic boycott of the Palestinian Authority by Israel and the west, Fatah has attempted to establish a coalition government with Hamas.

    However, talks repeatedly broke down before Mr Abbas threatened early elections. According to a senior aide to the Palestinian president, he plans to issue a decree next week to lay the legal foundations for a new ballot.

    Last night, the Palestinian prime minister, Ismail Haniyeh, accused the US of trying to bring down the Hamas government.

    "There was a direct decision to bring down this government and make it collapse, and the Americans are behind this policy," he said in a speech on Palestinian television.

    Yesterday, King Abdullah II of Jordan said he was prepared to host discussions between Fatah and Hamas leaders following a surprise visit to Amman by the Israeli prime minister, Ehud Olmert.

    In a separate incident yesterday, a 13-year-old Palestinian girl was shot by Israeli troops near the West Bank barrier in the town of Tulkarem.

    The Israeli military expressed regret over the incident, saying a platoon commander and a soldier had been suspended until an investigation was completed.